🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has upheld a ban on sending national guard in Portland, Oregon, after a recent court ruling.

Appeals Court Concurs to Rehear Case

The ninth circuit court of appeals ruled on this week that it would rehear the case concerning the president’s authority with an expanded panel of eleven justices. The court also vacated a previous decision from a smaller judicial group that had supported the federal government.

Ongoing Dispute Over Troop Deployment

This order represents the latest turn in a long-running court case over whether the administration has the authority and valid reason to deploy state military units in the city. Approximately two hundred troops have been in uncertainty since late September when the deployment effort was started in response to months of protests.

Conflicting Arguments

The administration has argued that government employees at the ICE facility in south Portland were under attack, while local authorities assert that municipal police have control of the situation.

Contrary to descriptions of Portland as a conflict zone, locals have been posting footage of scenic paths and a vibrant culinary culture, and organizing activities such as an protest bicycle event against the “militarization of our city”.

Court Proceedings

The appeals court decision came after a US district judge in Portland issued two legal injunctions this period – one blocking the federalization of the state troops, and another stopping the use of any military personnel in the state, after efforts to evade the initial injunction by mobilizing out-of-state forces.

On Monday, the ninth circuit panel had temporarily suspended the initial decision – permitting command of state troops – but the subsequent injunction stayed effective, blocking the actual deployment of the forces.

Full Panel Consideration

The Tuesday decision means the matter will be heard by the full court – with both rulings under consideration simultaneously – by a group of eleven justices.

“This ruling demonstrates that the truth matters and that the courts are working to ensure government responsibility. The founding document restricts the executive authority, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a training ground for unchecked federal authority,” said the state attorney general in a statement.

“The judicial body is sending a clear message: the executive leader cannot dispatch the military into US cities unnecessarily. We will continue defending Oregon’s laws, principles, and sovereignty as this case moves forward and our fight continues in the judicial system.”