Families' Heartache Regarding Shoreline Degradation Threatening Norfolk Graves
Families whose relatives buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision over how to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.
A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards
The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.
A newly published study on the situation details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.
“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”
Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles
One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.
“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”
“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”
A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril
Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.
“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”
She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”
Seeking Solutions and Certainty
An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.
Several families want more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.
“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”
A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”
It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”
“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the right answers for each village.”
The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.